Nmap Development mailing list archives

Re: Sounds like ftp-anon needs work?


From: Ron <ron () skullsecurity net>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 08:27:13 -0500

Absolutely! I do my best to answer scripting questions here or in #nmap on freenode whenever I can. 

(If you do ask in #nmap on Freenode, make sure you stick around for the answer :) ). 

On Tue, 18 May 2010 08:31:29 -0400 Walt Scrivens <walts () gate net> wrote:
This looks interesting.   I'll give it a try, but I'm a total N00B at
Nmap Scripting and I'm likely to have to ask a lot of questions.  OK?

Walt

On May 17, 2010, at 7:26 PM, Ron wrote:

http://eromang.zataz.com/2010/05/16/anonymous-ftp-scanning-differences-between-metasploit-and-nmap

Metasploit found about twice as many anonymous FTP servers than
Nmap's ftp-anon.nse script. Metasploit also says whether it's read
or read/write. 

Improving ftp-anon.nse might be a good task for somebody who's
looking to learn Nmap scripting a little. It's going to be more
troubleshooting than coding, likely. 

Any takers?

-- 
Ron Bowes
http://www.skullsecurity.org
http://www.twitter.com/iagox86
_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/



-- 
Ron Bowes
http://www.skullsecurity.org
http://www.twitter.com/iagox86

Attachment: _bin
Description:

_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://seclists.org/nmap-dev/

Current thread: