Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: smbv2-dos.nse
From: Patrick Donnelly <batrick () batbytes com>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:58:59 -0400
Hi Memphis, On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Memphis Bytes <memphisbytes () gmail com> wrote:
How about an "all-safe" option - leaving all as, well, all?
That is why we have boolean operators now for --script [1]. We can use "all and safe" (which can be reduced to "safe"). The exploit category would exist to provide a superset of scripts that are very likely to raise the ire of server/network admins. [1] http://nmap.org/book/man-nse.html -- -Patrick Donnelly "Let all men know thee, but no man know thee thoroughly: Men freely ford that see the shallows." - Benjamin Franklin _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- smbv2-dos.nse Ron (Sep 12)
- Re: smbv2-dos.nse Kris Katterjohn (Sep 12)
- Re: smbv2-dos.nse Ron (Sep 12)
- Re: smbv2-dos.nse Kris Katterjohn (Sep 12)
- Re: smbv2-dos.nse bensonk (Sep 12)
- Re: smbv2-dos.nse Lane Christiansen (Sep 12)
- Re: smbv2-dos.nse Ron (Sep 12)
- Re: smbv2-dos.nse Kris Katterjohn (Sep 12)
- Re: smbv2-dos.nse Fyodor (Sep 13)
- Re: smbv2-dos.nse jah (Sep 13)
- Re: smbv2-dos.nse Patrick Donnelly (Sep 13)
- Re: smbv2-dos.nse Memphis Bytes (Sep 13)
- Re: smbv2-dos.nse Patrick Donnelly (Sep 14)