Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: smbv2-dos.nse
From: Kris Katterjohn <katterjohn () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2009 11:14:30 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 09/12/2009 10:19 AM, Ron wrote:
I added it to the 'dos' category, which I don't think should be implied by 'all'.
I think it should be, since it's called "all". Just because so far "all" hasn't contained stuff like dos and exploit scripts doesn't mean it shouldn't live up to its name now. Correct me if I'm wrong, but couldn't you do "all and not dos" or something similiar for this effect? If the concern is for users accidently running evil dos and exploit scripts when they specify "all", then I'm not sure what to say. If they're going to blindly run "all" scripts without knowing what they do, then they're just in for trouble anyway. We shouldn't butcher a category like "all", when its name describes it perfectly in 3 letters. All is all. However if you're concerned with the fact that "all" isn't "relatively safe" anymore, so you can't type just 3 letters, I think the boolean rule above will suffice (or we could theoretically create yet another category to work around this, but I don't like that very much). Sorry if I've sounded stern; I've just wanted to get all of this out beforehand in case this discussion takes off :)
Ron
Cheers, Kris Katterjohn -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJKq8jmAAoJEEQxgFs5kUfuyrsQAK0JyIvDAmGjq32hdl1PONbF 0HZiwZW5qsQztcYMilMghg5136QYNNeOdI3qtP5z7Tr+LUZRV8P/9drSPPRUUsfP lrWQz5VU7atLE1sxE8vjBmm+4e2XUgYB/SJA4c9CEL6Mqa/PhWVPVIskOXPR9QsN tQKEuFrSYoTjWW7KDxC+9dply+rBNu1ZLVUQD9ZZP01eHciyePWnzAUTc4DaNo0d dKr/t/UJjeYXtf9T6KI/LF46sARKo7qJtC7UnWd3S+7Dm49KDpxXnjdtpGnUhhIq Us37CNCWrSJPFghyQKLbA2ZcGoq1DurJrneehY4MyLHTb3SPUbOZXH8VCM+Quxtu ba63yItX5otzhOPa9Ixt4zZ/XWWdVI5skvuhTPeffVKp4wI+RQnjG81lZHS8EzgA xF78RPA7Zo00VROLHFd85kQ0xb8JrTy53/zj84OGideOdMGFVJ7/lUY3hhVQOBoy BE6biHeh+QEtSJY0SPtH3w+d35ZCFT4nthRCyoQ8Kk79xV0ZR0HHD0EHDOLPG2tB hm2wZDyPToGiOVu1LNJM2xRSwA9rg9UDUaV/daAQTpl3VrW2ZWLf0J7HqXYxpVkA x52LsqNwLA1jT57lywHpWDPr8tUGy41sVvDsOf3vFyj81j5p+c4L2LajJ4UhNEzd G9U9nvIjP8pNGXC8Chgb =MWql -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- smbv2-dos.nse Ron (Sep 12)
- Re: smbv2-dos.nse Kris Katterjohn (Sep 12)
- Re: smbv2-dos.nse Ron (Sep 12)
- Re: smbv2-dos.nse Kris Katterjohn (Sep 12)
- Re: smbv2-dos.nse bensonk (Sep 12)
- Re: smbv2-dos.nse Lane Christiansen (Sep 12)
- Re: smbv2-dos.nse Ron (Sep 12)
- Re: smbv2-dos.nse Kris Katterjohn (Sep 12)
- Re: smbv2-dos.nse Fyodor (Sep 13)
- Re: smbv2-dos.nse jah (Sep 13)
- Re: smbv2-dos.nse Patrick Donnelly (Sep 13)
- Re: smbv2-dos.nse Memphis Bytes (Sep 13)
- Re: smbv2-dos.nse Patrick Donnelly (Sep 14)