Re: smbv2-dos.nse

[jah <jah () zadkiel plus com>]

I agree with Kris et al: "all" should mean all.
I think, however, that the script would be better categorised as
"exploit" rather than "dos" to complement the "vuln" category.  I don't
think it makes sense to start adding categories for each type of exploit
in the same way that we don't have a category for each type of
vulnerability.  Having said that, there isn't a large number of
vulnerability categories/exploit types and there might be some advantage
to adding these categories to scripts - you could then say "exploit and
not dos" or "vuln and not sqli" for example.

Regards,

jah

_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org