Re: [Lua snippit] print_hex

[Ron <ron () skullsecurity net>]

Patrick Donnelly wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Ron <ron () skullsecurity net> wrote:
>
> That looks fine. I put the "out" local out of the function definition
> to prevent the string from repeatedly being remade (numbers are
> constant folded but not strings). I did this mainly to expose people
> on the list to some good practices (among other things I did), even
> though it probably won't make a huge difference in a debugging
> function. If you moved it inside because you didn't want to clutter
> the surrounding function (the file) with variables, you can surround
> the print_hex function with do ... end to force scoping. e.g.:
>
> do
>   local out = "..."
>   function print_hex(str)
>     ...
>   end
> end
Putting the variable outside of a function like that has a weird field
to it. It seems like it's asking for trouble if something else happens
to use that name without scoping it to "local" as well. Putting do..end
fixes that potential issue, but it looks a little hackish to me.

I actually noticed a problem in the newest version, though. If
characters aren't in the standard printable range (0x20 - 0x7F), it
shouldn't try and display them. '\n' and '\r' screw up the output, for
example. Is there some easy way to fix that? I looked briefly, but
didn't see any clean way.

Thanks!
Ron


_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org