Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Major SIPOptions probe reorganisation
From: Fyodor <fyodor () insecure org>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 23:15:33 -0700
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 06:02:59AM +0000, Brandon Enright wrote:
* Boost the rarity of SIPOptionsThat seems like an abuse of rarity. I'd say a rarity of 5 is already pushing it. SIP really isn't *that* common.
You two agree here. Doug was proposing boosting the rarity to a higher number, which makes Nmap consider the service *more* rare. It is a bit confusing, and even I have to look it up sometimes at http://nmap.org/book/vscan-fileformat.html :). Cheers, -F _______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev Archived at http://SecLists.Org
Current thread:
- Major SIPOptions probe reorganisation doug (Jun 19)
- Re: Major SIPOptions probe reorganisation doug (Jun 19)
- Re: Major SIPOptions probe reorganisation Brandon Enright (Jun 19)
- Re: Major SIPOptions probe reorganisation Fyodor (Jun 19)
- Re: Major SIPOptions probe reorganisation Fyodor (Jun 19)
- Re: Major SIPOptions probe reorganisation Matt Selsky (Jun 20)
- Re: Major SIPOptions probe reorganisation doug (Jun 20)
- Re: Major SIPOptions probe reorganisation sara fink (Jun 21)
- Re: Major SIPOptions probe reorganisation Brandon Enright (Jun 19)
- Re: Major SIPOptions probe reorganisation doug (Jun 19)