Re: Two patches against 4.22SOC6 (liblua modules in libexec and liblua cflags)

[jah <jah () zadkiel plus com>]

Ok, these patches I can use.  I've applied them, renamed liblua/makefile 
to makefile.in and built.  (i'm on XP SP2)
There are no additional warnings/errors when building with the patches 
(see my posting "build warning: umit_py2exe: Version Info will not be 
included") and the resultant packages look good.

Christoph J. Thompson wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Oct 2007 21:01:57 -0600
> David Fifield <david () bamsoftware com> wrote:
>
>   
> > On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 11:35:38PM +0200, Christoph J. Thompson wrote:
> >     
> > > I'm unable to get the source from svn.
> > >       
> > Did you remember to use the user name "guest" and a blank password?
> > E.g.,
> >
> >      svn co --username guest --password ""
> > svn://svn.insecure.org/nmap
> >
> > See http://insecure.org/nmap/install/index.html#inst-svn. It says that
> > the "guest" user name is required because of a Subversion bug.
> >     
>
> Thanks for the tip.
>
> Here's are svn diffs of my patches. However when trying to make a svn diff of the liblua cflags patch, the diff 
> doesn't include the fact that I renamed the Makefile to Makefile.in. This needs to be done so everything works.
>
>
> --
> This email has been verified as Virus free
> Virus Protection and more available at http://www.plus.net
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
> http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
> Archived at http://SecLists.Org

_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Archived at http://SecLists.Org