Re: Performance of multiple nmaps

["Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman" <buanzo () buanzo com ar>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Miguel Dilaj wrote:
> Hi bro!
> Things are OK, hope you & your familiy are allright.

Good to hear that. My son is OK, but I divorced two months ago.

> I tried mostly everything mentioned here:
> http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/eserver/library/es-033104.html
> to no avail.

Then maybe you need to rethink the whole thing. Why do you need to run that much nmap instances, on
the whole port range, and with -T0? Wouldn passive scanning be of any help?

- --
Arturo "Buanzo" Busleiman - www.buanzo.com.ar
Consultor en Seguridad Informatica
President, Open Information System Security Group - Argentina
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFC1muoAlpOsGhXcE0RAth+AJ9p2TjdiQXWNpGz9fBGeWtxq/eXkQCbBlmj
l3++snG5WaDQbG3wJzYyIfY=
=8KnY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev