Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Performance of multiple nmaps
From: "Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman" <buanzo () buanzo com ar>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 09:21:39 -0300
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Miguel Dilaj wrote:
Hi all, New to the list here.
Hi brother, good to read you here :) - How's life doing there? ;)
I've been trying to find information on system tuning (and/or nmap tuning) for running multiple instances of nmap.
Playing with /proc sounds reasonable to me. - -- Arturo "Buanzo" Busleiman - www.buanzo.com.ar Consultor en Seguridad Informatica President, Open Information System Security Group - Argentina -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFC1ljNAlpOsGhXcE0RAi/gAJ42QNx7usM9+Z7SgLZDnv9BL68CHQCdFOJW vkl22WAvvKMZW2L1NtuG7U0= =H6GT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________ Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev
Current thread:
- Performance of multiple nmaps Miguel Dilaj (Jul 14)
- Re: Performance of multiple nmaps Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman (Jul 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Performance of multiple nmaps Miguel Dilaj (Jul 14)
- Re: Performance of multiple nmaps Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman (Jul 14)
- Re: Performance of multiple nmaps Miguel Dilaj (Jul 14)