Re: Performance of multiple nmaps

["Miguel Dilaj" <nekromancer () lycos com>]

Hi bro!

Things are OK, hope you & your familiy are allright.

I tried mostly everything mentioned here:

http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/eserver/library/es-033104.html

to no avail.

Today I discovered that ip_conntrack was using 23MB as reported by slabtop with only 3 nmaps running, so I'm in the 
process of using TCP Wrappers for the couple services we need, and dropping iptables. I hope that helps...

Cheers,

Miguel

----- Original Message -----
From: "Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman" <buanzo () buanzo com ar>
To: nmap-dev () insecure org
Subject: Re: Performance of multiple nmaps
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 09:21:39 -0300

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Miguel Dilaj wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > New to the list here.
>
> Hi brother, good to read you here :) - How's life doing there? ;)
>
> > I've been trying to find information on system tuning (and/or 
> > nmap tuning) for running multiple instances of nmap.
>
> Playing with /proc sounds reasonable to me.
>
> - --
> Arturo "Buanzo" Busleiman - www.buanzo.com.ar
> Consultor en Seguridad Informatica
> President, Open Information System Security Group - Argentina
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFC1ljNAlpOsGhXcE0RAi/gAJ42QNx7usM9+Z7SgLZDnv9BL68CHQCdFOJW
> vkl22WAvvKMZW2L1NtuG7U0=
> =H6GT
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

> _______________________________________________
> Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
> http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev


-- 
_______________________________________________
NEW! Lycos Dating Search. The only place to search multiple dating sites at once.
http://datingsearch.lycos.com



_______________________________________________
Sent through the nmap-dev mailing list
http://cgi.insecure.org/mailman/listinfo/nmap-dev