Nmap Development mailing list archives
Re: Nmap 3.80 preview
From: Martin Mačok <martin.macok () underground cz>
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 12:29:54 +0100
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 01:41:06AM -0800, Fyodor wrote:
I hope to improve on this when I move away from raw sockets and to sending raw ethernet frames by default. I'm tired of all these silly restrictions.
Will it stop working on non-ethernet networks? Is it worth it? Those restrictions on unix systems are usually easy to turn off.
Another way to think of it (with 3.81 semantics) is: -f (smallest fragments, 8 bytes) -ff (get bigger, 16 bytes) -fff (larget still, 24 bytes) -ffff (32 bytes) etc.
OK, this makes sense. Martin Mačok ICT Security Consultant --------------------------------------------------------------------- For help using this (nmap-dev) mailing list, send a blank email to nmap-dev-help () insecure org . List archive: http://seclists.org
Current thread:
- Nmap 3.80 preview Fyodor (Feb 05)
- Re: Nmap 3.80 preview Martin Mačok (Feb 06)
- Re: Nmap 3.80 preview Fyodor (Feb 06)
- Re: Nmap 3.80 preview Andreas Ericsson (Feb 07)
- Re: Nmap 3.80 preview Martin Mačok (Feb 07)
- Re: Nmap 3.80 preview Fyodor (Feb 07)
- Re: Nmap 3.80 preview Martin Mačok (Feb 07)
- Re: Nmap 3.80 preview Fyodor (Feb 06)
- Re: Nmap 3.80 preview Martin Mačok (Feb 06)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Nmap 3.80 preview Fyodor (Feb 10)