Nmap Development mailing list archives

Re: Nmap 3.80 preview


From: Fyodor <fyodor () insecure org>
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 23:17:55 -0800

On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 03:38:03PM +0100, Martin Ma?ok wrote:
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 03:17:16PM -0800, Fyodor wrote:

Actually, your version does mtu=8 for -f and mtu=8 for -ff too.

Oops.  You're right.  I covered the "-f" and "-f -f" cases, but forgot
to adjust the separate -ff flag.  Fixed for 3.81.


My original version was doing 8 for -ff and 16 for -f. I recommend
this patch to get mtu=8 for '-ff', '-f -f' or '--mtu 8' and mtu=16 for
'-f' or '--mtu 16':

I have a slight preference for having one -f do the smallest fragment
size (8) with the mtu getting bigger for each additional -f (so 16 for
-ff).  So this is what I'll do for Nmap 3.81 unless there is a good
reason for doing the opposite?

Cheers,
-F


---------------------------------------------------------------------
For help using this (nmap-dev) mailing list, send a blank email to 
nmap-dev-help () insecure org . List archive: http://seclists.org



Current thread: