Nmap Development mailing list archives
performance issues -- wtf
From: "Andy Lutomirski" <Luto () myrealbox com>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 17:24:16 -0800
Here's a good one: I run nmap -sS -P0 -n -r -v -d -d -p1-1000 <win2k box on local ethernet>, and it takes awhile. The debug shows that retries are needed. If I add --scan_delay 1, no (or very few) packets are dropped, and the scan completes much faster. I get the fastest results with --max_parallelism 1 (w/o scan_delay), but --max_parallelism 2 does not have nearly the same effect. If I add --win_norawsock, then the speeds are much increased without either max_parallelism or scan_delay, for --max_parallelism 1 is still the fastest. To add insult to injury, port 389 comes up filtered if and only if I do not set --win_nor (so that sends are over real raw sockets). WTF is happening? Andy Lutomirski
Current thread:
- performance issues -- wtf Andy Lutomirski (Apr 02)