Re: distributed nmap?

["Aaron D. Turner" <aturner () pobox com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


Personally, I would prefer a simple client/daemon wrapper for nmap.  That
would provide an easy to maintain layer of abstraction between nmap and
the means of communication.  One could write such an animal in a few hours
with Perl which would be almost as portable as a C app. 


- -- 
Aaron Turner           | Either which way, one half dozen or another. 
aturner () pobox com      | http://www.pobox.com/~aturner/

"There is no worse tyranny than to make a man pay for something he does
not want merely because you think it would be good for him." 
- -Benjamin Franklin

All emails from this account are PGP signed.  Lack of a signature is "bad".
PGP Key fingerprint = FB E1 CE ED 57 E4 AB 80  59 6E 60 BF 45 1B 20 E8


On Sat, 18 Mar 2000, Arturo Busleiman wrote:

> hi!
>
> Why not adding a --agent x.x.x.x [port] parameter?
> It would turn nmap into an agent, and the 'boss' client would be running
> at x.x.x.x (port [port] if specified)
>
> It would be easier, the boss client would be nmap --boss n
> it then would sit there waiting till 'n' agents connect, then allowing to
> enter scan options/targets, send them to each agent (of course, it would
> distribute the port range among them!!). 
>
> what do you think of this?
>
> *> Panic? My kernel doesn't panic! We are doomed! DustDustDust!!!!
> *> Get PGP KEY: use pgpk -a hkp://horowitz.surfnet.nl/buanzox () usa net
> *> System Fork BBS, en Argentina! (5411) 4799-2510 Dedaparamaxxaginos rules!
>   


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBONUuSTM3jpXy1kJtAQF9sgP/aGlBtq0OneOYkIlE1eLsKxPY0afv75R7
fm5bxtxIeG2e43Yz1wSqBBBFwoMEHkCgUlbudRbKSjl8edBJP9iUtO8THpmpNcqS
97Ux1kVcad8Ob9mgx/z1HkKWEL8mMj22ANslLNm1VrBydIfekljcMJLjbfhNzyl6
XxLowDWbpLI=
=ZRk3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----