nanog mailing list archives
Re: Networks ignoring prepends?
From: William Herrin <bill () herrin us>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 18:43:53 -0800
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 5:59 PM James Jun <james.jun () towardex com> wrote:
CL is choosing 3356 47787[x3] 53356 11875[x3] over better path via 1299: This is not a Lumen/CenturyLink/Level 3 problem. What you need to be doing is
Hi James, My solution has been to add two more-specific routes to -your- routing table so that my one prefix now consumes three routes. If you and the others defending Centurylink's behavior are satisfied with that solution, then we're done here. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William Herrin bill () herrin us https://bill.herrin.us/
Current thread:
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends?, (continued)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? James Jun (Jan 24)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? James Jun (Jan 22)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? William Herrin (Jan 22)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Owen DeLong via NANOG (Jan 22)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Tom Beecher (Jan 22)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Andrew Hoyos (Jan 23)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? William Herrin (Jan 22)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Nick Hilliard (Jan 22)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? William Herrin (Jan 22)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? James Jun (Jan 22)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? William Herrin (Jan 22)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? William Herrin (Jan 22)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Alex Le Heux (Jan 23)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? William Herrin (Jan 22)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Alex Le Heux (Jan 23)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? William Herrin (Jan 22)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Tom Beecher (Jan 22)
- RE: Networks ignoring prepends? Jeff Behrns via NANOG (Jan 22)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Tom Beecher (Jan 23)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Darrel Lewis (Jan 23)
- Re: Networks ignoring prepends? Robert Raszuk (Jan 24)