nanog mailing list archives
Re: NANOG 90 Attendance?
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 16:37:57 -0800
We actually had an IETF "Help Desk" at NANOG 63 (San Antonio, 2015) and NANOG 64 or 65 ― https://www.internetsociety.org/blog/2015/01/chris-grundemann-nanog-63-talking-bcop-ietf-and-more/ and https://www.internetsociety.org/blog/2014/11/operators-and-the-ietf-update-from-ietf-91/ We hoped to answer questions such as: “Why should I participate in the IETF?” “How do I get involved in the IETF?” “What is the difference between an Internet-Draft and an RFC?” “How do I submit an idea to the IETF?” “What is the IETF working on in <foo> space?” “How do I comment on an existing IETF document?” <your question here>
perhaps the internet would benefit more from the inverse, a help desk at the ietf for "what is internet operation and how does it actually work?" randy
Current thread:
- Re: NANOG 90 Attendance?, (continued)
- Re: NANOG 90 Attendance? Tom Beecher (Feb 13)
- Re: NANOG 90 Attendance? Glen A. Pearce (Feb 13)
- Re: NANOG 90 Attendance? Mike Hammett (Feb 14)
- Re: NANOG 90 Attendance? Paul Ebersman (Feb 14)
- Re: NANOG 90 Attendance? Tom Beecher (Feb 14)
- RE: NANOG 90 Attendance? Howard, Lee via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: NANOG 90 Attendance? Tom Beecher (Feb 15)
- RE: NANOG 90 Attendance? Howard, Lee via NANOG (Feb 15)
- RE: NANOG 90 Attendance? Warren Kumari (Feb 19)
- Re: NANOG 90 Attendance? Randy Bush (Feb 19)
- Re: NANOG 90 Attendance? Warren Kumari (Feb 20)