nanog mailing list archives
Re: NANOG 90 Attendance?
From: Paul Ebersman <list-nanog2 () dragon net>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 17:05:39 -0700
mhammett> This seems more ideological and not overly appropriate for mhammett> NANOG. No, covid protocols are something that every conference that is serious about inclusion should be *very* concerned with. Saying that NANOG doesn't care about this says that NANOG can't be bothered to make an effort to make the conference safe for more folks. There's a reason I'm not there in person, even though I've attended for years, spoken there, and volunteered for multiple rounds on committees.
Current thread:
- NANOG 90 Attendance? Mike Hammett (Feb 11)
- Re: NANOG 90 Attendance? Ryan Hamel (Feb 11)
- Re: NANOG 90 Attendance? Tom Beecher (Feb 11)
- Re: NANOG 90 Attendance? Mike Hammett (Feb 11)
- Re: NANOG 90 Attendance? Glen A. Pearce (Feb 13)
- Re: NANOG 90 Attendance? Tom Beecher (Feb 13)
- Re: NANOG 90 Attendance? Glen A. Pearce (Feb 13)
- Re: NANOG 90 Attendance? Mike Hammett (Feb 14)
- Re: NANOG 90 Attendance? Paul Ebersman (Feb 14)
- Re: NANOG 90 Attendance? Tom Beecher (Feb 14)
- Re: NANOG 90 Attendance? Tom Beecher (Feb 11)
- Re: NANOG 90 Attendance? Ryan Hamel (Feb 11)
- RE: NANOG 90 Attendance? Howard, Lee via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: NANOG 90 Attendance? Tom Beecher (Feb 15)
- RE: NANOG 90 Attendance? Howard, Lee via NANOG (Feb 15)
- RE: NANOG 90 Attendance? Warren Kumari (Feb 19)
- Re: NANOG 90 Attendance? Randy Bush (Feb 19)
- Re: NANOG 90 Attendance? Warren Kumari (Feb 20)