nanog mailing list archives
Re: The Reg does 240/4
From: Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 09:27:56 -0600 (CST)
Evidence to support Tom's statement: https://auctions.ipv4.global/prior-sales ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest-IX http://www.midwest-ix.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Beecher" <beecher () beecher cc> To: "Brian Knight" <ml () knight-networks com> Cc: nanog () nanog org Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2024 5:31:42 PM Subject: Re: The Reg does 240/4 $/IPv4 address peaked in 2021, and has been declining since. On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 16:05 Brian Knight via NANOG < nanog () nanog org > wrote: On 2024-02-15 13:10, Lyndon Nerenberg (VE7TFX/VE6BBM) wrote:
I've said it before, and I'll say it again: The only thing stopping global IPv6 deployment is Netflix continuing to offer services over IPv4. If Netflix dropped IPv4, you would see IPv6 available *everywhere* within a month.
As others have noted, and to paraphrase a long-ago quote from this mailing list, I'm sure all of Netflix's competitors hope Netflix does that. I remain hopeful that the climbing price of unique, available IPv4 addresses eventually forces migration to v6. From my armchair, only through economics will this situation will be resolved.
--lyndon
-Brian
Current thread:
- Re: The Reg does 240/4, (continued)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Tom Beecher (Feb 14)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Owen DeLong via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Christopher Hawker (Feb 15)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Owen DeLong via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Lyndon Nerenberg (VE7TFX/VE6BBM) (Feb 15)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 William Herrin (Feb 15)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Owen DeLong via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Brian Knight via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Tom Beecher (Feb 15)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Brian Knight via NANOG (Feb 15)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Mike Hammett (Feb 16)
- RE: The Reg does 240/4 Howard, Lee via NANOG (Feb 16)
- Re: The Reg does 240/4 Tom Beecher (Feb 15)
- IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4) Stephen Satchell (Feb 15)
- Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4) Mark Andrews (Feb 15)
- Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4) John Levine (Feb 15)
- Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4) Justin Streiner (Feb 15)
- Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4) Stephen Satchell (Feb 15)
- Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4) Jay R. Ashworth (Feb 16)
- Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4) William Herrin (Feb 16)
- Re: IPv6 uptake (was: The Reg does 240/4) Michael Thomas (Feb 16)