nanog mailing list archives
Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ?
From: Robert Blayzor via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 14:12:22 -0400
On 9/29/23 03:34, Mark Tinka wrote:
RAM is not the issue... it's FIB.If you pay me for FIB slots, I'm happy to install /32's to your heart's content 🙂.
And convergence times to process all that extra noise... The line in the sand has been drawn; just say no to >/24 ... -- inoc.net!rblayzor XMPP: rblayzor.AT.inoc.net PGP: https://pgp.inoc.net/rblayzor/
Current thread:
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ?, (continued)
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ? VOLKAN SALÄ°H (Sep 29)
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ? VOLKAN SALÄ°H (Sep 29)
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ? VOLKAN SALÄ°H (Sep 29)
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ? William Herrin (Sep 28)
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ? Elmar K. Bins (Sep 29)
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ? Tom Beecher (Sep 29)
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ? Mark Tinka (Sep 29)
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ? Saku Ytti (Sep 29)
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ? Robert Blayzor via NANOG (Sep 29)
- Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ? Randy Bush (Sep 30)