Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ?

[VOLKAN SALİH <volkan.salih.06 () gmail com>]

Also keep in mind;

single-homed networks never need full-table..

multi-homed networks could also do default routing just packet-mark 
incoming interface and then route packets out via same interface..

I do not see gain in running BGP full-table, _*excluding*_ networks 
using Intelligent routing optimizers that run jitter and ping tests..

but these are just my ideas.., i respect all ideas.. we are here to 
discuss..

There are people running full-table of v4 and v6 _*just for fun*_... I 
guess it makes them happy when they look thousands of routes available 
on single interface!

I am pretty sure Tier-1 and Tier-2 networks have enough money for 
upgrades. But i may be wrong. What do you think?

Thanks and regards


29.09.2023 07:43 tarihinde VOLKAN SALİH yazdı:
> how would you route 800 Gigabit-ethernet that will soon be released as 
> IEEE standart?
>
> we were paying 1 usd per megabit several years ago. now it is as low 
> as 4 usd cent.
>
> As i said before, the future is coming just now. There must be ways to 
> increase CPU caches and memories of routers.
>
> It is also about wholesale. When you buy cheaper routers, powerful 
> routers stay expensive.
>
> But when everybody upgrades, memory and processor unit prices 
> decrease.. Vendors gain from demand.
>
>
> 29.09.2023 07:31 tarihinde William Herrin yazdı:
> > Others use an expensive kind of memory
> > called a TCAM that's very fast but both expensive and power hungry, so
> > generally not sized for huge numbers of tiny routes.