nanog mailing list archives

Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ?


From: "Delong.com via NANOG" <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 11:35:38 -0700



On Oct 5, 2023, at 15:51, Geoff Huston <gih () apnic net> wrote:

On 6 Oct 2023, at 6:13 am, Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:

Ratio of FIB to RIB is only part of the equation.

IPv6 is NOT under the disaggregation pressure that IPv4 is under because there is no pressure (other than perhaps 
scarcity mentality from those that don’t properly understand IPv6) to dense-pack IPv6 assignments or undersize IPv6 
allocations.

Look at the difference in prefixes per ASN across the two tables and that tells a much grimmer story for IPv4 in 
terms of RIB growth vs. IPv6.


hmm - IPv4 is at [1], IPv6 is at [2]

Now I’m trying to understand what your grimmer story for IPv4 might be here Owen. Since 2005 the number of IPv4 FIB 
entries per origin AS has increased fropm 8 to 12 in the past 20 years - or a 50% increase. Over ther same period the 
number of IPv6  prefix advertisements per origin AS has increased from 1.5 to 6, or a fourfold increase. If anything, 
the IPv6 story appears to me to be a far greater cause for concern, but you may have a different interpretation of 
this data.

I admit I’m surprised that IPv6 has gotten to an average of 6, but it would be interesting to know why that is. 
Honestly, I expected it would end up closer to 4. I wonder how much of that is PI stub networks being originated by 
upstream transit networks. I also wonder to what extent the “average” might be misleading here. Is it a few ASs with 
large numbers of prefixes and mostly 1-2 prefixes per AS or is the average representative?

I know that in IPv4, for example, there are several ASs originating MANY prefixes and lots of smaller ASs originating 
<4 prefixes.

My grimmer picture for IPv4 is about the intrinsic pressure to deaggregate that comes from the ever finer splitting of 
blocks in the transfer market and the ever finer grained dense packing of hosts into prefixes that is forced from 
address scarcity. Those pressures don’t (or at least shouldn’t) exist for IPv6.

YMMV

Owen


Current thread: