nanog mailing list archives
RE: Starlink routing
From: Kevin McCormick <kmccormick () mdtc net>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 22:49:03 +0000
My original thought was this would be more like Client Optimized Roaming with WiFi access points. Communication between the client dish or base station and satellites to transparently move client dish and base station from satellites moving out of view to a satellite in view. Kevin McCormick -----Original Message----- From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+kmccormick=mdtc.net () nanog org> On Behalf Of Michael Thomas Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2023 4:43 PM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: Starlink routing CAUTION: This email originated from outside your organization. Exercise caution when opening attachments or clicking links, especially from unknown senders. I read in the Economist that the gen of starlink satellites will have the ability to route messages between each satellite. Would conventional routing protocols be up to such a challenge? Or would it have to be custom made for that problem? And since a lot of companies and countries are getting on that action, it seems like fertile ground for (bad) wheel reinvention? Mike
Current thread:
- Re: Starlink routing, (continued)
- Re: Starlink routing Forrest Christian (List Account) (Jan 22)
- Re: Starlink routing Jorge Amodio (Jan 23)
- Re: Starlink routing Forrest Christian (List Account) (Jan 23)
- Re: Starlink routing Tom Beecher (Jan 23)
- Re: Starlink routing William Herrin (Jan 23)
- Re: Starlink routing Eric Kuhnke (Jan 23)
- Re: Starlink routing Eric Kuhnke (Jan 23)
- Re: Starlink routing Michael Thomas (Jan 23)
- Re: Starlink routing Eric Kuhnke (Jan 23)