nanog mailing list archives
Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup
From: Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 07:19:19 -0500 (CDT)
I would agree with that. We've had gear with 40-gig ports for many years (>6)? Never found a CDN or transport network that would do 40. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions Midwest Internet Exchange The Brothers WISP ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Tinka" <mark@tinka.africa> To: "Mike Hammett" <nanog () ics-il net> Cc: nanog () nanog org Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2023 10:33:07 PM Subject: Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup On 8/28/23 03:05, Mike Hammett wrote: Well, or they simply found a potential deal on hardware that came with 40 gig ports. 40 gigs is still a lot of bits to a lot of people. For internal use, sure. But when connecting to another AS, the chances of them supporting 40Gbps in one or more places is inconsistent to slim. Exchange points may be an exception. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup, (continued)
- Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup tim () pelican org (Aug 23)
- Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup Aaron Gould (Aug 23)
- Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup Andrey Kostin (Aug 24)
- Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup Eric Kuhnke (Aug 26)
- Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup Mark Tinka (Aug 26)
- Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup Mike Hammett (Aug 27)
- Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup Mark Tinka (Aug 27)
- Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup Daniel Marks via NANOG (Aug 27)
- Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup Mark Tinka (Aug 28)
- Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup Eric Kuhnke (Aug 28)
- Message not available
- Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup Mike Hammett (Aug 28)
- Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup Tom Beecher (Aug 28)
- Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup Dave Cohen (Aug 28)
- Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup Pascal Masha (Aug 28)
- Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup Mark Tinka (Aug 23)