Re: MX204 Virtual Chassis Setup

[Aaron Gould <aaron1 () gvtc com>]

some of these port capabilities are weird to me.  like on the 
ACX7100-48L you can do 4x100 or 8x50, but ONLY one 40g ?!

me@7100> show chassis pic pic-slot 0 fpc-slot 0 | find 400
  48     0       1x400G 1x100G 1x40G 4x100G 2x100G 8x50G 2x50G 4x25G 
4x10G 3x100G
  49     0       1x400G 1x100G 1x40G 4x100G 2x100G 8x50G 2x50G 4x25G 
4x10G 3x100G
  50     0       1x400G 1x100G 1x40G 4x100G 2x100G 8x50G 2x50G 4x25G 
4x10G 3x100G
  51     0       1x400G 1x100G 1x40G 4x100G 2x100G 8x50G 2x50G 4x25G 
4x10G 3x100G
  52     0       1x400G 1x100G 1x40G 4x100G 2x100G 8x50G 2x50G 4x25G 
4x10G 3x100G
  53     0       1x400G 1x100G 1x40G 4x100G 2x100G 8x50G 2x50G 4x25G 
4x10G 3x100G
  54     NA      1x10G




On 8/23/2023 11:29 AM, tim () pelican org wrote:
> On Wednesday, 23 August, 2023 16:33, "Mark Tinka" <mark@tinka.africa> said:
>
> [faceplate oversubscription]
>
> > On the new ACX line, yes.
> Not Trio, and different PLM :)
>
> > We don't mess around with any other MX products, so not sure (although
> > we are still yet to deploy the MPC10E's and the MX304).
> MX304 (well, strictly LMIC16) has the same restriction, and a need for another entry in the magic port checker 
> (https://apps.juniper.net/home/port-checker/index.html) for restrictions beyond "SUM(port-speeds) <= 1.6T".
>
> They make sense once you've looked at the block diagram for the thing and followed the lines, but things like "4x10G 
> breakout can only go in odd-numbered ports, and you have to leave the corresponding next-lowest even-numbered port empty" are not 
> instantly obvious.
>
> Thanks,
> Tim.
--
-Aaron