nanog mailing list archives
Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers
From: Aaron Wendel <aaron () wholesaleinternet net>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2022 13:30:35 -0500
On 5/24/2022 10:48 AM, Mitchell Tanenbaum via NANOG wrote:
I have two fixed wireless Internet connections here. One is 25/5, the other is 35/5. There is no cable, no fiber, no cellular, not even DSL from the phone company. That is reality in metro Denver, CO (actually, the foothills, 25 miles from the state Capitol building).Regarding Starlink, no, you can’t get it. I paid my deposit a year and a half ago and I am still on the waiting list. Every time that I get close to the date they promise, they change the promise. Maybe I will get Starlink service some time in the future, but, not any time soon.Oh, yeah, and 25 meg down costs $75 a month. If you want VoIP, that is another $20+.So not only is it slow, it is expensive too.So yes, there still is a problem, right here in America. And not just in the boonies.Mitch
This brings up another issues no one is really talking about and that's affordability. We're about to lower our price on 10G to the home to $50/mo because that was the number the FCC would pay people who qualified. Now they've lowered that subsidy to $30. The pandemic exposed the fact that there are a lot of people out there that just can't afford the current pricing structure. We give a gig away for free with a one time install fee and we had people calling us who's kids were at home for school and they couldn't afford the $25/mo we'd break their $300 install into. We ended up just waiving a ton of fees during those early COVID days.
Aaron
Current thread:
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers, (continued)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers bzs (May 28)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Mike Hammett (May 31)
- RE: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Richard Irving (May 29)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Jared Mauch (May 29)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Sean Donelan (May 23)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers David Bass (May 24)
- RE: Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Jamie Bowden via NANOG (May 24)
- RE: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Brian Turnbow via NANOG (May 24)
- RE: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Matthew Huff (May 24)
- RE: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Mitchell Tanenbaum via NANOG (May 24)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Aaron Wendel (May 24)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers David Bass (May 24)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Mike Hammett (May 31)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Jeff Shultz (May 26)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers tim () pelican org (May 27)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Owen DeLong via NANOG (May 27)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Sean Donelan (May 27)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Eric Kuhnke (May 29)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Owen DeLong via NANOG (May 30)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers John Levine (May 30)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Livingood, Jason via NANOG (May 31)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Jared Mauch (May 31)