nanog mailing list archives

Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers


From: Owen DeLong via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 15:26:18 -0700

Is it?

What’s the bandwidth of a good quality 4K stream? What about 4 of them + various additional interactive technologies, 
software downloads, media downloads, etc.?

Looking at the graphs, my household (which isn’t average by any stretch of the imagination, but it is a household) 
doesn’t need a gig very often, but there are the occasional multiple hours where my Gig downstream does flatline at 
about 950Mbps.

So I’d say that I make sufficiently frequent use of the gig that is available as to render it unlikely I would be 
satisfied with less bandwidth.

Owen


On May 23, 2022, at 12:29 , David Bass <davidbass570 () gmail com> wrote:

What is changing in the next 5 years that could possibly require a household to need a gig?  That is just ridiculous. 

On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 3:15 PM Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com <mailto:mike () mtcc com>> wrote:

On 5/23/22 12:04 PM, Thomas Nadeau wrote:


On May 23, 2022, at 3:00 PM, Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com <mailto:mike () mtcc com>> wrote:


On 5/23/22 11:49 AM, Aaron Wendel wrote:
The Fiber Broadband Association estimates that the average US household will need more than a gig within 5 years. 
 Why not just jump it to a gig or more?

Really? What is the average household doing to use up a gig worth of bandwidth?

Mike
Thats almost the same question we were asked at BT a dozen years ago when moving from DSL -> FTTC when someone 
said, “but surely DSL is sufficient because its so much faster than dial.”

The two of us survive just fine with 25Mbs even when we have a house 
full of friends. I mean it would be nice to have 100Mbs so that it's 
never a problem but the reality is that it just hasn't been a problem in 
practice. I mean how many 4k streams are running at the same time in the 
average household? What else besides game downloads are sucking up that 
much bandwidth all of the time?

Mike



—Tom



On 5/23/2022 1:40 PM, Sean Donelan wrote:
https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-proposes-higher-speed-goals-small-rural-broadband-providers-0 
<https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-proposes-higher-speed-goals-small-rural-broadband-providers-0>

The Federal Communications Commission voted [May 19, 2022] to seek comment on a proposal to provide additional 
universal service support to certain rural carriers in exchange for increasing deployment to more locations at 
higher speeds. The proposal would make changes to the Alternative Connect America Cost Model (A-CAM) program, 
with the goal of achieving widespread deployment of faster 100/20 Mbps broadband service throughout the rural 
areas served by rural carriers currently receiving A-CAM support.



Current thread: