nanog mailing list archives
Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers
From: Casey Russell via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2022 09:56:17 -0500
For a long time now... I have had the opinion that we have reached the age of "peak bandwidth", that nearly nobody's 4 person home needs more than 50Mbit with good queue management. Certainly increasing upload speeds dramatically (and making static IP addressing and saner firewalling feasible) might shift some resources from the cloud, which I'd like (anyone using tailscale here?), but despite 8k video (which nobody can discern), it's really hard to use up > 50Mbit for more than a second or three with current applications.
One single digital game download to a console (xbox, playstation, etc.) can be over 80Gb of data. That's half of your Saturday just waiting to play a game. That assumes you'r'e getting the full 50Mbit (your provider isn't oversubscribing) to yourself in the home. It also assumes your console (and all the games on it) is fully updated when you fired it up to download that new game. Hope you didn't want a couple of new games (after Christmas or a birthday). I admit, it's not a daily activity, and it might not look like much in a monthly average. But I'd argue there are plenty of applications where 50Mbit equals HOURS of download wait for "average families" already today, not seconds.
Current thread:
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers, (continued)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Owen DeLong via NANOG (Jun 01)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Livingood, Jason via NANOG (Jun 01)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Michael Thomas (Jun 02)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Livingood, Jason via NANOG (Jun 03)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Masataka Ohta (Jun 03)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Dave Taht (Jun 05)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Masataka Ohta (Jun 06)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Dave Taht (Jun 06)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Michael Thomas (Jun 06)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Sean Donelan (Jun 06)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Michael Thomas (Jun 02)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Casey Russell via NANOG (Jun 06)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Jason Canady (Jun 06)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Casey Russell via NANOG (Jun 06)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Sean Donelan (Jun 06)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Kord Martin (Jun 06)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Sean Donelan (Jun 06)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Mike Hammett (Jun 06)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Michael Thomas (Jun 06)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Casey Russell via NANOG (Jun 06)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Michael Thomas (Jun 06)
- Re: FCC proposes higher speed goals (100/20 Mbps) for USF providers Chris Adams (Jun 06)