nanog mailing list archives
Re: Upstream bandwidth usage
From: Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa>
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2022 02:15:12 +0200
On 6/10/22 12:01, Jared Mauch wrote:
You would be surprised. The equipment isn't that expensive in the grand scheme of things.
Fair point, it's not part of our scope at $day_job.Most of the greenfields I'm seeing in my region are standard GPON, and I'm not hearing of existing deployments being upgraded to XG-PON. But then again, perhaps I don't have my hand on the pulse as much as I think I should do :-)...
Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage, (continued)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mark Tinka (Jun 10)
- RE: Upstream bandwidth usage Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mark Tinka (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Jared Mauch (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Kord Martin (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mark Tinka (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Aled Morris via NANOG (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Brandon Martin (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mike Hammett (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Jay Hennigan (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mark Tinka (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Karsten Thomann via NANOG (Jun 11)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Dave Taht (Jun 11)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mark Tinka (Jun 12)