nanog mailing list archives
Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices
From: Sander Steffann <sander () steffann nl>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 23:52:41 +0100
Hi Randy,
this is quite true, and a serious issue. but it has a good side. if you run an ipv6 enebled network, you can deploy srv6 without enabling srv6 everywhere, only at the marking encaps or embed) points. nice for partial and/or incremental deployment.
Yep, that's what I like about it! But I haven't figured out a way to mitigate the risks. Easy deployment == easy abuse it seems :( Cheers, Sander
Current thread:
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices, (continued)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Saku Ytti (Jan 11)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Mark Tinka (Jan 11)
- RE: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Adam Thompson (Jan 11)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Mark Tinka (Jan 11)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Saku Ytti (Jan 12)
- RE: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices aaron1 (Jan 12)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Saku Ytti (Jan 12)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Sander Steffann (Jan 12)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Dale W. Carder (Jan 12)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Randy Bush (Jan 12)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Sander Steffann (Jan 12)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Saku Ytti (Jan 11)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Colton Conor (Jan 12)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Mark Tinka (Jan 12)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Saku Ytti (Jan 13)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Colton Conor (Jan 15)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices -> MPLS instead? Raymond Burkholder (Jan 15)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices -> MPLS instead? Mark Tinka (Jan 15)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices -> MPLS instead? scott (Jan 15)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Mark Tinka (Jan 15)
- Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices Jeff Tantsura (Jan 15)