Re: SRv6 Capable NOS and Devices

[Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa>]

On 1/11/22 19:20, Saku Ytti wrote:

> And you have this use-case? And you can't use MPLSoUDP?
>
> SRv6 is pure snake oil, an easy marketing story to people with limited
> knowledge. 'It is just IP bro, you already know it'. I'd like to to
> continue 'like already widely used X', but I don't dare, considering
> it's so established despite its obvious benefits only existing in
> marketability.

100%.

In a market where Cisco can no longer guarantee that operators will be 
spending US$50 million a year, minimum, they have to find a way to make 
it difficult for you to live without them.

Mark.