nanog mailing list archives

Re: BANDWIDTH and VONAGE lose FCC rules exemption for STIR/SHAKEN


From: Tom Beecher <beecher () beecher cc>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 22:17:03 -0500

Can confirm this. ( Except it was my dad who joined AARP, and we share the
same name. Apparently most telemarketer databases don't quite deal with
suffixes in names that well!)

On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 10:41 PM Matthew Petach <mpetach () netflight com>
wrote:


What made my otherwise-largely-quiescent phone go
berserk was joining AARP.

Went from weeks between random telemarketing call to
now getting sometimes more than 100 calls before
lunchtime.  Today, I couldn't hang up on one person
offering me Medicare benefits fast enough before
another was already beeping on call waiting.  :/

Moral of the story?

If you retire and join AARP, put your most hated
enemy's phone number down instead of yours.  :(

Matt


On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 7:28 PM Tom Mitchell <tmitchell () netelastic com>
wrote:

I've seen an uptick, but nothing too dramatic.  Maybe 4-5 junk calls a
day - mostly afternoon.

-- Tom


On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 9:57 AM Josh Luthman <josh () imaginenetworksllc com>
wrote:

Mine exploded since the requirement date.  Some mornings I get a dozen
before lunch.

On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 2:33 PM Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com> wrote:


On 2/17/22 11:58 AM, Sean Donelan wrote:


https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-finds-two-providers-failed-fully-implement-stirshaken-0


The Federal Communications Commission today took action to ensure
that
voice service providers meet their commitments and obligations to
implement STIR/SHAKEN standards to combat spoofed robocall scams.
Specifically, voice service providers Bandwidth and Vonage lost a
partial exemption from STIR/SHAKEN because they failed to meet
STIR/SHAKEN implementation commitments and have been referred to the
FCC’s Enforcement Bureau for further investigation.


So for probably a year or so before the Stir/Shaken mandate came, I
have
been seeing a lot less phone spam. I don't know if that's typical but
it
was quite noticeable for me. What that tells me is that providers
likely
started clamping down on their shady customers well ahead of the
mandate
which says that regulatory fiat would have been sufficient too. But
that
hinges on whether my situation is typical though.

Mike



Current thread: