nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 woes - RFC
From: Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa>
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2021 06:33:25 +0200
On 9/5/21 04:49, John Levine wrote:
Well, some of us are. I have a choice of an excellent local fiber ISP that does not offer IPv6 or Spectrum cable which is generally awful but does have v6. So I use a tunnel. I have asked my ISP about IPv6 and their answer is that that they're not opposed to it but since I am the only person who has asked for it, it's quite low on the list of things to do.
Supporting the routing and forwarding of IP addresses is just about the most basic thing any ISP should do.
If that is low on their to-do list, what else could they possibly be doing? Mark.
Current thread:
- IPv6 woes - RFC Grant Taylor via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Jeroen Massar via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Ryan Hamel (Sep 04)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Jeroen Massar via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC John Levine (Sep 04)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Justin Streiner (Sep 04)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Tinka (Sep 04)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Aaron C. de Bruyn via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Tinka (Sep 05)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Brian Knight via NANOG (Sep 05)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Tinka (Sep 05)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Ryan Hamel (Sep 04)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Jeroen Massar via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Niels Bakker (Sep 04)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Saku Ytti (Sep 04)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Grant Taylor via NANOG (Sep 04)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Bjørn Mork (Sep 05)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Niels Bakker (Sep 05)