Re: [External] Re: uPRF strict more

[Mark Tinka <mark@tinka.africa>]

On 10/1/21 01:51, Valdis Klētnieks wrote:

> Am I insufficently caffienated, or is uRPF the least of your problems
> if you don't have a full table *and* don't have a default route?

A partial table with no default is perfectly fine for a peering router.

As long as your peering router knows how to get to your prefixes and 
those of your customers, as well as the prefixes of the networks you 
peer with, you're good to go.

Mark.