nanog mailing list archives

Re: uPRF strict more


From: Blake Hudson <blake () ispn net>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 08:19:01 -0500


On 9/29/2021 5:30 PM, Sabri Berisha wrote:
----- On Sep 29, 2021, at 8:03 AM, Blake Hudson blake () ispn net wrote:

Hi Blake,

     200 deny ip 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255 any (91057035 matches)
     210 deny ip 172.16.0.0 0.15.255.255 any (1366408 matches)
     220 deny ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 any (18325538 matches)
These could perhaps be ICMP host unreachables transmitted by your
peers' infrastructure? I've seen my share of production networks
running on RFC1918 space while routing public blocks.

That's entirely possible, wouldn't even need to be one of my peers. It could be from the remote end or one of it's peers (a host unreachable would likely come from the remote end, I suppose a net unreachable could come from anywhere in the path). Not sure I want to change anything on my end to accommodate someone's use of RFC-1918 addresses on the public internet.


Current thread: