nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 woes - RFC
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 13:18:28 -0700
the ietf did not give guidance to cpe vendors to protect toys inside your LANguidance aside... 'Time To Market' (or "Minimum Viable Product - MVP!) is likely to impact all of our security 'requirements'. :(
that point was made in the paper i cited
I also thought 'homenet' (https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/homenet) was supposed to have provided the guidance you seek here?
got a cite for the guidance? randy
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Baldur Norddahl (Sep 29)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Victor Kuarsingh (Sep 29)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 29)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Valdis Klētnieks (Sep 30)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Victor Kuarsingh (Sep 30)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 30)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 28)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Randy Bush (Sep 28)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Christopher Morrow (Sep 28)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Michael Thomas (Sep 28)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Randy Bush (Sep 28)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Christopher Morrow (Sep 29)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Andrews (Sep 28)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Randy Bush (Sep 28)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Victor Kuarsingh (Sep 28)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Saku Ytti (Sep 28)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Joe Maimon (Sep 24)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 24)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 24)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC borg (Sep 25)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Baldur Norddahl (Sep 25)