nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6 woes - RFC
From: "Valdis Klētnieks" <valdis.kletnieks () vt edu>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 22:01:46 -0400
On Wed, 29 Sep 2021 16:09:26 -0400, Victor Kuarsingh said:
- Both providers provide IPv6 and delegate a prefix to the router (let's pretend the retail staff knew enough to sell this person a consumer box with 2x WAN interfaces)
So... do such boxes exist in any great quantity? Do consumers who can't add a valid number after 'IPv' accidentally contract for Internet service from two different providers often? Do they intentionally do that often? It sounds like a sufficiently rare situation that "clueless lawyer/whatever hires somebody with clue for 2 hours work to configure it all" is a reasonable solution.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC, (continued)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 29)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Michael Thomas (Sep 29)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Victor Kuarsingh (Sep 29)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Michael Thomas (Sep 29)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Victor Kuarsingh (Sep 29)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Michael Thomas (Sep 29)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 29)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Baldur Norddahl (Sep 29)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Victor Kuarsingh (Sep 29)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 29)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Valdis Klētnieks (Sep 30)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Victor Kuarsingh (Sep 30)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 30)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Owen DeLong via NANOG (Sep 28)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Randy Bush (Sep 28)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Christopher Morrow (Sep 28)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Michael Thomas (Sep 28)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Randy Bush (Sep 28)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Christopher Morrow (Sep 29)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Mark Andrews (Sep 28)
- Re: IPv6 woes - RFC Randy Bush (Sep 28)