nanog mailing list archives

Re: Rack rails on network equipment


From: Shawn L via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2021 17:38:33 -0400

Why about thinks like the Cisco 4500 switch series that are almost as long as a 1u server.  But yet only has mounts for 
a relay type rack. 

As far as boot times, try a Asr920.  Wait 15 minutes and decide if it’s time to power cycle again or wait 5 more 
minutes 

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 25, 2021, at 5:22 PM, Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com> wrote:


On 9/25/21 2:08 PM, Jay Hennigan wrote:
On 9/25/21 13:55, Baldur Norddahl wrote:

My personal itch is how new equipment seems to have even worse boot time than previous generations. I am currently 
installing juniper acx710 and while they are nice, they also make me wait 15 minutes to boot. This is a tremendous 
waste of time during installation. I can not leave the site without verification and typically I also have some 
tasks to do after boot.

Besides if you have a crash or power interruption, the customers are not happy to wait additionally 15 minutes to 
get online again.

Switches in particular have a lot of ASICs that need to be loaded on boot. This takes time and they're really not 
optimized for speed on a process that occurs once.

It doesn't seem like it would take too many reboots to really mess with your reliability numbers for uptime. And what 
on earth are the developers doing with that kind of debug cycle time?

Mike


Current thread: