nanog mailing list archives
Re: Rack rails on network equipment
From: ic <lists () benappy com>
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2021 09:44:56 -0400
Hi,
On 24 Sep 2021, at 12:37, Andrey Khomyakov <khomyakov.andrey () gmail com> wrote: (you know, where most of your server ports are…)
Port side intake (switch at the front of the rack) is generally better for cooling the optical modules. The extra cabling difficulty is worth it. Also, as others said, choosing an arguably inferior product only because it’s easier to rack sounds like a bad idea. BR, ic
Current thread:
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment, (continued)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Doug McIntyre (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Joe Greco (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment George Herbert (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Joe Maimon (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Wayne Bouchard (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment George Herbert (Sep 25)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Jay Hennigan (Sep 25)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Joe Greco (Sep 25)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment William Allen Simpson (Sep 27)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Doug McIntyre (Sep 27)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment George Herbert (Sep 25)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Doug McIntyre (Sep 24)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Baldur Norddahl (Sep 25)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Jay Hennigan (Sep 25)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Michael Thomas (Sep 25)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Shawn L via NANOG (Sep 25)
- Re: Rack rails on network equipment Mel Beckman (Sep 27)