Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections

[Josh Luthman <josh () imaginenetworksllc com>]

I think it's hilarious when a governmental entity funded by the taxpayers
thinks they have an answer to broadband.  If you're collecting funds from
customers, why do you need the City of Sherwood to support your network?

Josh Luthman
24/7 Help Desk: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373


On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 6:22 PM Brandon Price <PriceB () sherwoodoregon gov>
wrote:

> 100/100 minimum for sure.
>
> In our small neck of the woods, we are currently doing 250/250 for $45 and
> 1000/1000 for $60 no data caps.
>
> We have lost some grants on rural builds because "someone" in the census
> block claims they provide broadband.. Not hard to put an AP up on a tower
> and hit the current definition's upload speed.
>
> I get a chuckle when the providers tell the customer what they "need"...
>
>
> Brandon Price
> Senior Network Engineer
> City of Sherwood, Sherwood Broadband
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: NANOG <nanog-bounces+priceb=sherwoodoregon.gov () nanog org> On Behalf
> Of Sean Donelan
> Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2021 5:33 PM
> To: NANOG Operators' Group <nanog () nanog org>
> Subject: Re: New minimum speed for US broadband connections
>
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
> click links or open attachments unless you are expecting this email and/or
> know the content is safe.
>
>
> On Thu, 27 May 2021, Lady Benjamin Cannon of Glencoe, ASCE wrote:
> > At least 100/100.
> >
> > We don’t like selling slower than 10g anymore, that’s what I’d start
> everyone at if I could.
>
>
> At $50/month or less?
>
> Maximize number of households of all demographic groups.