Re: Nice work Ron

["J. Hellenthal via NANOG" <nanog () nanog org>]

Cool nice work Ron! Maybe a new subject for what this is really about  ...

-- 
 J. Hellenthal

The fact that there's a highway to Hell but only a stairway to Heaven says a lot about anticipated traffic volume.

> On Jan 24, 2021, at 13:36, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG <nanog () nanog org> wrote:
>
> Again, I'm not saying is the best way, is what the community *decided* before I added a clarification. The 50% was 
> not a change, just to make it explicit, what was the actual interpretation.
>
> If you don't like it, stop complaining, and send a policy proposal, I could even support it, but I'm not convinced it 
> will reach consensus.
>
>
>
> El 24/1/21 15:34, "NANOG en nombre de Masataka Ohta" <nanog-bounces+jordi.palet=consulintel.es () nanog org en 
> nombre de mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp> escribió:
>
>    JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG wrote:
>
> > I fully understand what you mean, however, I don’t think this is a
> > problem even if all the RIRs ask for “%50 or even 100%” of usage in
> > the region.
>
>    So, you don't know how most, if not all, ISPs are operating
>    their network.
>
> > That will make your life more complex, as you will need to obtain
>
>    It makes ISP's operations a lot more complex and a lot less
>    profitable to be ignored by almost all, if not all, ISPs.
>
>    Your theory that ISPs could have behaved otherwise is not
>    helpful in the real world of business and not practically
>    acceptable by RIRs mostly consisting of ISPs.
>
>                            Masataka Ohta
>
>
>
> **********************************************
> IPv4 is over
> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> http://www.theipv6company.com
> The IPv6 Company
>
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to 
> be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, 
> distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly 
> prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any 
> disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached 
> files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to 
> inform about this communication and delete it.