nanog mailing list archives
Re: Nice work Ron
From: Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2021 04:22:34 +0300
Peace, On Fri, Jan 22, 2021, 3:24 PM Masataka Ohta < mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp> wrote:
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG wrote:
My proposal added the clarification that "majority" is understood as "over 50%". And the proposal is denied to be unreasonable by Toma and, more aggressively, by me.
Having seen my name being mentioned here, what I want to highlight is that: 1) I was asking that just out of idle curiosity; 2) The important context with this is that two people seem to be arguing about this: one (me) from the European Union, which is within the RIPE NCC region, and the other, apparently from the APNIC region, as far as the TLD in the email address could tell. And we're discussing LACNIC policies within the mailing list that is mostly related to the operations within the ARIN region. Though I definitely agree with certain points been made, this appears to be entirely off the topic of the NANOG, and I'm accepting the blame for raising this here. -- Töma
Current thread:
- Re: Nice work Ron, (continued)
- Re: Nice work Ron Masataka Ohta (Jan 24)
- Re: Nice work Ron John Sage (Jan 24)
- Past policies versus present and future uses Matthew Petach (Jan 24)
- Re: Past policies versus present and future uses John Sage (Jan 24)
- Re: Past policies versus present and future uses JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via NANOG (Jan 24)
- Re: Past policies versus present and future uses Rob McEwen (Jan 25)
- Re: Past policies versus present and future uses Rob McEwen (Jan 25)
- Re: Past policies versus present and future uses Rubens Kuhl (Jan 25)
- Re: Past policies versus present and future uses Rob McEwen (Jan 25)
- Re: Past policies versus present and future uses Rich Kulawiec (Jan 26)
- Re: Nice work Ron Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 22)
- Re: Nice work Ron Mark Andrews (Jan 22)
- Re: Nice work Ron George Herbert (Jan 22)
- Re: Nice work Ron Alain Hebert (Jan 21)
- Re: Nice work Ron Ethan (Jan 21)