nanog mailing list archives
Re: DoD IP Space
From: Doug Barton <dougb () dougbarton us>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 11:55:06 -0800
Joe,I haven't done that kind of work for a few years now, but I assume the answer to your question in terms of hardware is still yes.
By and large the problem isn't hardware, it's finding the institutional will to actually do the thing. That requires a lot of education, creating or buying resources that can do the architecture, and ultimately the rollout, etc. etc.
And before all of that you have to overcome the fear of things that are new and different, and even 20 years later that's still a tough hill to climb.
Doug On 1/21/21 1:01 PM, j k wrote:
Organizations I have worked with for IPv6 transition, reduced CAPex and OPex by leveraging the IT refresh cycle, and by ensuring there investment included leveraging the USGv6 (https://www.nist.gov/programs-projects/usgv6-program) or IPv6Ready (https://www.ipv6ready.org/) to mitigate the "We sell IPv6 products, and want to you to pay for the debugging costs".Can I assume other organizations don't leverage the IT refresh cycle? Joe Klein
Current thread:
- Re: DoD IP Space, (continued)
- Re: DoD IP Space Dorn Hetzel (Jan 20)
- Re: DoD IP Space Owen DeLong (Jan 20)
- Re: DoD IP Space Brandon Martin (Jan 20)
- Re: DoD IP Space Jim Young via NANOG (Jan 20)
- Re: DoD IP Space Fred Baker (Jan 20)
- Re: DoD IP Space Doug Barton (Jan 20)
- Re: DoD IP Space Andy Ringsmuth (Jan 21)
- Re: DoD IP Space Sabri Berisha (Jan 21)
- Re: DoD IP Space Brandon Svec (Jan 21)
- Re: DoD IP Space j k (Jan 21)
- Re: DoD IP Space Doug Barton (Jan 22)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mark Andrews (Jan 21)
- RE: DoD IP Space Travis Garrison (Jan 22)
- Re: DoD IP Space Tom Beecher (Jan 22)
- Re: DoD IP Space surfer (Jan 22)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mark Andrews (Jan 22)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mark Andrews (Jan 22)
- Re: DoD IP Space Doug Barton (Jan 22)
- RE: DoD IP Space Travis Garrison (Jan 24)
- Re: DoD IP Space Mark Andrews (Jan 24)
- Re: DoD IP Space surfer (Jan 22)