nanog mailing list archives

Re: Submitting Fake Geolocation for blocks to Data Brokers and RIRs


From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 11:45:53 -0400

On Apr 22, 2021, at 10:23 AM, Matthew Petach <mpetach () netflight com> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 7:12 AM nanoguser100 via NANOG <nanog () nanog org> wrote:
William,

The plan is to carve out a /24 for "Estonia" and have special servers on it.  This would be the same /24 I'd have to 
use if I were to put a legitimate POP there.  This also means I don't conflict with the real Germany.

I am just worried about violating the 'rules' of these providers and getting myself blacklisted from submitting 
corrections.  Afterall the traceroute will still show us hitting a router in Germany before it hits my network.  
Traceroutes aren't the end all be all but it's a tell-tale sign.

I guess this is all ISP-reported info so it's not "illegal" or a violation in any way.

-Nanoguser100

Love the fact you try to anonymize the question - after giving details like “server is in German, we want it to appear 
in Estonia”.

Anyway....



I think it's safe to say that before anyone could be 
held accountable for geolocation data, there would 
have to *first* be a requirement that the data be able 
to be reliably updated to be *correct*.

Matt: I find it amusing you think rationality and logic have anything to do with government activity. You are not 
usually this naïve.


As we have not yet achieved a way of ensuring that 
legitimate holders of IP resources can reliably update 
the geolocation data, I think you can rest assured, 
nobody will be holding you accountable for whatever 
the geolocation data might show for a particular block 
of addresses.

I am not at all certain of this. At the very least, the maintainer of the information may hold it against you if they 
find out you have intentionally falsified the data. Remember, the people offering IP address <> Geo-location databases 
for money are not beholden to you. They are beholden to the people paying them money. If $CONTENT_OWNER wants to ensure 
only devices in Estonia get certain content, and you go out of your way to allow devices in German get the content, 
this could present a problem.

Will they sue you? I cannot see that happening. Will they ignore any future updates you give them? Would not surprise 
me.

BTW: I know VPN providers advertise this precise ability. However, at least the VPN end point is where they say it is.


Now, if, as an industry, we had a consistent, reliable 
way in which geolocation records could be updated 
with a means to audit and ensure the updates are 
being made only by the legitimate holders of the 
number resources...*then* you might have reason 
to be concerned.

Wait, I thought we did. At least I see it in every movie….


But as of now, as evidenced by the number of 
"how do I get my geolocation data updated" 
emails sent to NANOG, which result in a flurry 
of "meetoo" followups, no reasonable court 
would ever give any legal credence to the 
current data in the various geolocation 
databases.

I find a difference between “we tried to keep the data straight, but there are mistakes” and “this data was 
intentionally misrepresented”. My guess is the law might as well.

As stated above, I seriously doubt anyone will someone sue you over it. Will you go to jail? Yeah, again, I cannot see 
that happening. Doesn’t mean you should do it.


You can sleep soundly at night, whichever 
road you may choose to take.

What is this “sleep” you mention?

-- 
TTFN,
patrick


Current thread: