nanog mailing list archives
RE: SRv6
From: <aaron1 () gvtc com>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 19:01:31 -0500
You might be on to something, but I'm unsure... are you suggesting that it's any less private over SRv6 than it was over MPLS ? -----Original Message----- From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2020 1:12 PM To: aaron1 () gvtc com Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog () nanog org> Subject: Re: SRv6
I'm still learning, but, It does seem interesting that the IP layer (v6) can now support vpn's without mpls.
as the packet payload is nekkid cleartext, where is the P in vpn?
Current thread:
- Re: SRv6, (continued)
- RE: SRv6 aaron1 (Sep 15)
- Re: SRv6 Randy Bush (Sep 15)
- Re: SRv6 Mark Tinka (Sep 16)
- Re: SRv6 Anoop Ghanwani (Sep 16)
- Re: SRv6 Randy Bush (Sep 16)
- Re: SRv6 Mark Tinka (Sep 17)
- Re: SRv6 mark seery (Sep 17)
- Re: SRv6 Mark Tinka (Sep 17)
- Re: SRv6 mark seery (Sep 17)
- Re: SRv6 Mark Tinka (Sep 17)
- Re: SRv6 tim () pelican org (Sep 18)