Re: BGP Community - AS0 is de-facto "no-export-to" marker - Any ASN reserved to "export-only-to"?'

[Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>]

Sounds like you need a template based configuration management system and better automation more than you need to 
inflict an ad-hoc standardization of additional communities on the world.

Owen


> On Sep 9, 2020, at 12:21 AM, Robert Raszuk via NANOG <nanog () nanog org> wrote:
>
> Mark,
>
> Nope .. it is the other way around.
>
> It is all easy if you look from your network centric view.
>
> But if I am connected to 10 ISPs in each POP I have to build 10 different egress policies, each embedding custom 
> policy, teach NOC to understand it etc...
>
> I think if there is a defined way to express prepend N times to my ISP peers across all uplinks or lower local pref 
> in my ISP network in a same way to group of ISPs I see the value.
>
> Best Regards,
> R.
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2020, 06:36 Mark Tinka via NANOG <nanog () nanog org <mailto:nanog () nanog org>> wrote:
>
>
> On 8/Sep/20 23:22, Douglas Fischer via NANOG wrote:
>
> > Exactly Mike!
> >
> > The Idea would be to define some base levels, to make the creations of route-filtering simpler to everyone in the 
> > world.
> > And what comes beyond that, is in charge of each autonomous system.
> >
> > It would make the scripting and templates easier and would avoid fat-fingers.
>
> Are we saying that what individual operators design for their own networks is "complicated", and that coalescing 
> around a single "de facto" standard would simplify that?
>
> Mark.