nanog mailing list archives
Re: alternative to voip gateways
From: "Mark Delany" <k3f () november emu st>
Date: 11 May 2020 20:31:43 +0000
We need to keep battery backup requirements, and expand them to all last mile IP bits. The need to call 911 has not gone away.
For sure. I was merely observing that the conversion of POTS to VOIP in Australia didn't create a nation-wide disaster as the pearl-clutchers once predicted. In fact, if anything, the same folk who complained about the so-called largesse of a nationwide IP last-mile are strangely silent now that WFH is de rigueur. To your point, the original plan was 90+% passive optical back to major exchanges so the infrastructure was largely invulnerable to wide-scale power shutdowns/failures. All a residence has to do is feed a 7W NTD to stay connected. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: alternative to voip gateways, (continued)
- Re: alternative to voip gateways Mike Hammett (May 10)
- Re: alternative to voip gateways Baldur Norddahl (May 10)
- Message not available
- Re: alternative to voip gateways Clayton Zekelman (May 10)
- Re: alternative to voip gateways Mike Hammett (May 10)
- Re: alternative to voip gateways Baldur Norddahl (May 10)
- Re: alternative to voip gateways Mike Hammett (May 10)
- Re: alternative to voip gateways Nick Edwards (May 10)
- Re: alternative to voip gateways Colton Conor (May 11)
- Re: alternative to voip gateways Mark Delany (May 11)
- Re: alternative to voip gateways Michael Thomas (May 11)
- Re: alternative to voip gateways Mark Delany (May 11)
- Re: alternative to voip gateways Michael Thomas (May 11)
- Re: alternative to voip gateways Nick Edwards (May 25)
- Re: alternative to voip gateways Nick Edwards (May 10)
- Re: alternative to voip gateways Michael Thomas (May 10)
- Re: alternative to voip gateways Nick Edwards (May 10)
- Re: alternative to voip gateways Michael Thomas (May 10)
- Re: alternative to voip gateways Shawn L via NANOG (May 02)
- Re: alternative to voip gateways Nick Edwards (May 02)