nanog mailing list archives
Re: China’s Slow Transnational Network
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka () seacom mu>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 10:17:19 +0200
On 3/Mar/20 00:57, Tom Paseka via NANOG wrote:
Prices are set artificially high, so their interconnection partners wont purchase enough capacity. additionally, the three don't purchase enough to cover demand for their own network. Results in congestion.
We've seen somewhat similar behaviour from these networks when peering outside of China, perhaps, to influence the flow of money and traffic. We have zero patience for such things. Mark.
Current thread:
- Re: China’s Slow Transnational Network, (continued)
- Re: China’s Slow Transnational Network Tom Beecher (Mar 02)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: China’s Slow Transnational Network Pengxiong Zhu (Mar 02)
- Re: China’s Slow Transnational Network Pengxiong Zhu (Mar 02)
- RE: China’s Slow Transnational Network David Guo via NANOG (Mar 03)
- Re: China’s Slow Transnational Network Matt Corallo (Mar 02)
- Re: China’s Slow Transnational Network Pengxiong Zhu (Mar 02)
- Re: China’s Slow Transnational Network Matt Corallo (Mar 02)
- Re: China’s Slow Transnational Network Pengxiong Zhu (Mar 02)
- Re: China’s Slow Transnational Network Tom Paseka via NANOG (Mar 02)
- Re: China’s Slow Transnational Network Mark Tinka (Mar 03)
- Re: China’s Slow Transnational Network Pengxiong Zhu (Mar 15)
- Re: China’s Slow Transnational Network Mark Tinka (Mar 15)
- Re: China’s Slow Transnational Network Frank Habicht (Mar 15)
- Re: China’s Slow Transnational Network Mark Tinka (Mar 15)
- Re: China’s Slow Transnational Network Pengxiong Zhu (Mar 21)
- Re: China’s Slow Transnational Network Mark Tinka (Mar 21)
- Re: China’s Slow Transnational Network Pengxiong Zhu (Mar 21)
- Re: China’s Slow Transnational Network Pengxiong Zhu (Mar 02)