Re: Chairman Pai Proposes Mandating STIR/SHAKEN To Combat Robocalls

[Stephen Satchell <list () satchell net>]

On 3/8/20 9:59 AM, Damian Menscher via NANOG wrote:
> In the robocall case, there*is*  something the end user can do to fight the
> abuse: answer every call, and keep them on the line as long as possible.
> They are paying for connected calls, for the connection duration, and for
> the humans to scam people.  If everyone tarpitted them, the business model
> would fail.

+1

When I recognize the name and number on caller ID, I'll answer in the 
usual manner.

I answer calls when I don't recognize the name or number, but say 
nothing.  The caller then drops the connection, usually in 10 seconds -- 
and I hear the disconnect -- and usually my cordless phone's base 
station notices the disconnect as well.  (Yes, I still have a standard 
POTS line.)

What if it's an unknown person but otherwise valid and not robo-call? 
They will notice the ringback tone stopping and will say "Hello, hello?" 
at which point I can have a conversation.  (Some robocallers will notice 
the ringback tone stopping and start their automated spew, at which 
point I press "Off.")

This helps keep my blood pressure low, keeps my answering machine from 
filling up with useless calls, and I feel good that someone just spent a 
nickle for nothing.