nanog mailing list archives
Re: sfps from fs dot com
From: Brandon Martin <lists.nanog () monmotha net>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 11:04:52 -0400
On 9/20/19 10:43 AM, Mel Beckman wrote:
We buy them extensively and have had zero data problems with more than 300 parts in the field. Some switch/router manufacturers’ firmware poutily refuses to let you read snmp stats from any “unauthorized” SFPs modules, and some oem salespeople lyingly claim that using them voids your warranty, but this is just an attempt to keep customers captive to insanely overpriced OEM parts.
And if you buy them coded to said switch/router vendor (or code them yourself with the "fs box" which is reasonably priced), said switch/routers usually start cooperating for you. -- Brandon Martin
Current thread:
- sfps from fs dot com Nicholas Warren (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Jared Mauch (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Mel Beckman (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Brandon Martin (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Mel Beckman (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Brandon Martin (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Bryan Holloway (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Jason Lixfeld (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Bryan Holloway (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Jason Lixfeld (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Neil Hanlon (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Alain Hebert (Sep 23)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Bryan Holloway (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Jared Mauch (Sep 20)
- RE: sfps from fs dot com Kevin McCormick (Sep 20)
- RE: sfps from fs dot com Chris Gross (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Dennis Lundström (Sep 20)