nanog mailing list archives
RE: sfps from fs dot com
From: Chris Gross <CGross () ninestarconnect com>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 13:21:52 +0000
Biggest issue I've seen is it may work on some Cisco models and not others. I got their flashing box to just reflash the firmware and that has fixed even "dead" optics. -----Original Message----- From: NANOG <nanog-bounces () nanog org> On Behalf Of Nicholas Warren Sent: Friday, September 20, 2019 8:32 AM To: nanog () nanog org Subject: sfps from fs dot com CAUTION: This email originated from outside NineStar Connect. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know that the content is safe. If you have any concerns, click here<mailto:help () ninestarconnect com> to open a ticket with the NetAdmin team. ________________________________ Anyone have experience with fs.com's lasers? Are they reliable?
Current thread:
- Re: sfps from fs dot com, (continued)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Mel Beckman (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Brandon Martin (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Mel Beckman (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Brandon Martin (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Bryan Holloway (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Jason Lixfeld (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Bryan Holloway (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Jason Lixfeld (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Neil Hanlon (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Alain Hebert (Sep 23)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Bryan Holloway (Sep 20)
- RE: sfps from fs dot com Kevin McCormick (Sep 20)
- RE: sfps from fs dot com Chris Gross (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Dennis Lundström (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Matthew Crocker (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Carl Peterson (Sep 20)
- Re: sfps from fs dot com Nikolas Geyer (Sep 20)
- RE: sfps from fs dot com Michel Py (Sep 20)